Skip to main content


BBC's Question Time producer is a right wing extremist

The BBC is facing a fresh scandal, as an audience producer for its Question Time show was revealed to have links to far-right groups Britain First and the English Defence League. Viewers who have felt the show favours right-wing panellists and audience members feel this goes some way to vindicating their argument.

A fresh scandal erupts at the BBC, and might explain allegations of ‘bias’ on Question Time

Alison Fuller and the Far Right

According to The canary Alison Fuller is an audience producer for BBC Question Time. As a 2010 article for leading press industry magazine put it:

Every week audience producer Alison Fuller has to select the audience and, depending on the city they are in, this can mean considering more than 4,000 applications. This process involves checking the background of every applicant against their political affiliations, campaign involvements, advertising intentions, and many other factors.
 But it has also been revealed that Alison Fuller may have sympathies with Britain’s far-right. The woman responsible for ensuring a diverse and representative audience at BBC Question Time has been sharing Britain First memes on Facebook.




She was also discovered reaching out to obscure far-right groups to invite them into the audience.


The Canary approached Fuller and BBC Question Time for comment through the BBC press office on 5 December but received no response.

The Rightward Slide of BBC Question Time

While Fuller’s Facebook activity is concerning, it would be less of a story without the context of a perceived rightward slide at BBC Question Time. But is this slide perception or reality? The programme faces accusations from the right of left-wing bias, and from the left of right-wing bias.

The New Statesman argued in its most recent piece on the issue that there was a marginally higher appearance by figures that it identified as right-wing. But it concluded:

That slight, slight tilt to the right is barely worth talking about. In terms of political content as provided by the guests there is more or less a balance.
 A closer look explains why The New Statesman was wrong.

The New Statesman’s definition of left and right was determined by party affiliation for political guests, and no transparency was provided on how they established the left or rightward leanings of media or other panellists. The Guardian’s data blog ran a piece on the issue which was far more illuminating.

On the surface, Labour has been represented most on the panel of BBC Question Time. Proof of a left-wing bias, surely?


But when we see the actual guests, the numbers look somewhat different.


Although on the surface, we see a sea of red – how many of these names are left-wing?

Two, maybe three?

Despite this data, The Guardian came to the same conclusion as The New Statesman: Nothing to see here. No major issue of balance.

This is because both outlets live within the same bubble as BBC Question Time. They have become unable to even define left and right in terms anyone outside the bubble would recognise.

The Bubble

The bubble is neoliberalism.

And a panel which represents all shades of neoliberalism is not diverse. This is in part why everyone outside the neoliberal bubble – left and right – feels let down by Question Time.

People on the left see an almost unbroken guest list of economic neoliberals and see the right-wing bias. People on the right see an almost unbroken guest list of social liberals (pro-equal marriage, anti-racism, pro-gender equality etc) and see the left-wing bias. In reality, both groups are seeing the same thing – a bias in favour of an unforgivably narrow slice of socio-economic opinion.

Complainants on the right miss a major issue, though the regular scapegoating of welfare claimants, immigrants and other marginalised groups for the failures of neoliberalism. This fuels the right, by playing into its tropes in order to remove pressure from neoliberal politicians and economists for their own failures. It also undermines the real and affected claims of social liberalism presented by the Labour right, the Liberal Democrats, and the Conservatives. While individuals may have genuinely-held socially liberal views, this scapegoating process ends up enabling the right-wing, and delivering structurally regressive policies: anti-immigration rhetoric and policy; weakened terms and conditions for working people; cuts to critical welfare and services; the curtailing of human rights and civil liberties; the erosion of our right to privacy. The end result is a more authoritarian, less liberal government and society.

By presenting itself as balanced, BBC Question Time plays its part in keeping Britain small. It prevents broader discussion and protects neoliberalism from challenge – particularly from the left. This makes it easier for right-wing attacks to take centre stage. And the right has only ever been interested in dealing with the scapegoats, not the roots of the problem with neoliberalism itself. The chilling effects of this approach can be seen in the rise of the right across Europe and the US. This scandal is bigger than Alison Fuller, Question Time, and even the BBC. It goes to the heart of a media and political establishment that is failing and taking the nation down with it.

PLEASE COMMENT BELOW. The Site is open to the public. Therefore, consider your comments carefully and do not include anything in a comment that you would like to keep private. By uploading or otherwise making available any information to the Author in the form of user generated comments or otherwise, you grant the Author the unlimited, perpetual right to distribute, display, publish, reproduce, reuse and copy the information contained therein. You are responsible for the content you post. You may not impersonate any other person through the Site. You may not post content that is obscene, defamatory, threatening, fraudulent, invasive of another person’s privacy rights or is otherwise unlawful. You may not post content that infringes the intellectual property rights of any other person or entity. You may not post any content that contains any computer viruses or any other code designed to disrupt, damage, or limit the functioning of any computer software or hardware. ALL OUR WORK IS FREE SO PLEASE SUPPORT BDTN AND DONATE HERE TO HELP US CONTINUE. Thankyou.

Disqus for Ste Matthew Murray


Popular posts from this blog

UK Lord Justice wanted age of consent lowered to the age of 4

Lord Justice Fulford was named last year as an adviser to the QueenHe was a key backer of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange Police suspect the group of abusing children on an ‘industrial scale’He is revealed as a founder member of campaign to defend PIEAt the time it was calling for the age of consent to be lowered to just fourI clashed with Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) global leaders at the Wales conference in Swansea in 1977. Tom O’Carroll is still accepted and active on a sexnet chat group of experts in “sexology” although he writes openly as a pedophile. And the scholarly organizers of the Swansea conference at the University were part of his efforts. Below a summary of my intro to him in my book, Stolen Honor, Stolen Innocence, 2013. This academic pedophile lobby has continued and grown, training second generation and third generation supporters as “scholars” for pedophile equality and “rights.” In 1981 I realized they were global. See the B4UAct conference wi…

Jews in Israel call for genocide of Palestinians in a massive rally ignored by the media

The West’s media—under orders to censor any news of Jewish supremacism—has refused to publicise this week’s massive hate rally attended by thousands of Jews in Tel Aviv which called for all Arabs to be killed. The Western media’s blackout is in marked contrast to their blanket coverage of the tiniest example of what it calls “white racism.” The Tel Aviv rally—organized to support an Israeli soldier who murdered a wounded Palestinian by shooting him in the head as the victim lay on his back—was marked by chants and banners calling for mass murder. The rally took place on Tuesday evening, April 19, in Tel Aviv’s Yitzhak Rabin Square, and the many thousands of Jews in the crowd were, according to reports in the Israeli media, baying for blood.
One Jewish reporter, Dan Cohen, tweeted that many in the crowd chanted, “Death to Arabs,” a frequently heard rallying cry at anti-Palestinian demonstrations. Ahmed Tibi, a Palestinian lawmaker in Israel’s parliament, posted an image of a sign displayed …

The elite's use young children's blood to live longer and so do I says Paypal Billionaire

Billionaire PayPal founder Peter Thiel said that he believes transfusions of blood from young people can reverse his ageing process and allow him to live a vastly extended lifespan.

In an interview with’s Jeff Bercovici, Thiel said that the practice — known as parabiosis — is the closest modern science has come to creating an anti-aging panacea.

Thiel — a hedge funder who acted as a delegate for Donald Trump and spoke at the 2016 Republican National Convention — is reportedly obsessed with defying death and extending the human lifespan. He has injected funds into startups that are experimenting with ways to forestall the body’s inevitable decline and death.

“I’m looking into parabiosis stuff,” Thiel told Bercovici, “where they [injected] the young blood into older mice and they found that had a massive rejuvenating effect. … I think there are a lot of these things that have been strangely underexplored.”

Parabiosis experiments began in the 1950s with crude exercises in which rats …