Skip to main content

Share

That great feeling when you hear Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen have been arrested

Britain First leader Paul Golding and his deputy Jayda Fransen have been arrested after a police investigation into their 'Christian Patrol' in Luton last month and have subsequently banned from the "entire town".
Huffington Post Reports: 
The far-right party announced the arrests on their website on Monday, saying their leaders were currently being held in Kent.
"At the request of Luton police, Paul and Jayda had to present themselves, not in Luton, but in a Kent police station because they did not want them to approach Luton in any way," the party website reported.
According to Britain First, Golding and Fransen were both arrested for wearing "political uniforms" while on a "leafleting session in Luton several weeks ago". That was, in fact, their highly controversial 'Christian Patrol'.
britain first
Britain First leader Paul Golding and his deputy Jayda Fransen are said to have been arrested in relation to their 'Christian Patrol' in Luton earlier this month
"The video of this particular activity was seen by almost 30 million people and clearly shows a barrage of racism, bigotry and violence directed at Britain First by the local Muslims of Luton.
"To our knowledge, none of the local Muslims have been arrested."
A later report by Britain First indicated that the pair had been bailed but were now prevented from entering the "entire town of Luton in any way".
Another condition imposed, which the party said was "more disgraceful", was that the duo have to attend a London police station every Saturday to sign in which means "that both Paul and Jayda will be unable to attend any days of action, protests or activities on any Saturday for the next four months".
paul golding
Golding's bail form which shows he has been banned from entering Luton
The party said it is going to apply immediately to magistrates to "have this part of the conditions challenged".
Kent police referred the Huffington Post UK to Bedfordshire Police for comment but they are yet to respond.
Earlier this month the party begged members for donations to fight Bedfordshire Police's attempts to ban it from returning to Luton in the wake of their 'Christian Patrol'. Britain First claimed the move would give the "Muslim bigots of Bury Park… free rein to inflict violence and racism on outsiders."
On 23, January, around 20 Britain First members marched through Bury Park carrying wooden crosses and confronting local Muslims about trying to "take over" Britain, in an incident condemned as "inflaming" tensions. A video of the event gained more than 25 million views on Britain First's Facebook page before the social network removed it. The footage is still viewable on YouTube where it has been watched more than two million times.
In the days after the march, Bedfordshire police said they had made no arrests, but announced they were investigating to see if any crimes had been committed. At a packed public meeting at Bury Park Community Centre, earlier this month police told the Luton community they were trying to ban Britain First from returning to the town.
Assistant chief constable Mark Collins told the meeting: "We are making three commitments, the first being an investigation which will leave no stone unturned, the second is that we will be seeking an injunction to prevent Britain First from returning to Luton and thirdly that no members of the local community will be arrested over the events of last Saturday."
Bedfordshire Police unsuccessfully sought a court injunction to ban Golding and Fransen from entering Luton and its surrounding area for a year, ahead of a march the party hosted on June 27 last year. However, it was granted an interim injunction that restricted Golding and Fransen's behaviour in the town.
The injunction banned Golding and Fransen, either by themselves, or by instructing or encouraging or giving permission to any other person from:
  • Entering any mosque or Islamic Cultural Centre or its private grounds within England or Wales without prior written invitation.
  • Publishing, distributing or displaying, or causing to be published, distributed or displayed any words or images, whether electronic or otherwise which having regard to all the circumstances are likely to stir up religious and/or racial hatred.
  • Using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour thereby causing harassment, alarm or distress to any person
  • Carrying or displaying in Luton on Saturday, 27 June, 2015, at or in connection with the march by 'Britain First' any banner or sign with the words 'No More Mosques', or similar words or words to like effect.
The police were also given the power of arrest should either party breach any of the terms of the injunction
At that time, Chief Superintendent David Boyle said: "This injunction was sought due to concerns that their presence in Luton could increase the possibility of disorder and anti-social behaviour in the town.
"The terms which have been agreed today give us greater power to ensure that order is kept in the town during the demonstration.
"I would like to be clear that it was never our intention to ban any demonstration and we will always facilitate peaceful protest where possible.
"We have a policing plan in place to ensure we meet the needs of those wishing to demonstrate."
britain first
Britain First deputy leader Jayda Fransen confronts a local Luton resident during the 'Christian Patrol'
Bedfordshire Police told the Huffington Post UK earlier this month that the force was investigating any "potential breach" of the interim injunction and urged anyone is "with information or evidence in the form of photographs or video footage" to contact them. 

During the 'Christian Patrol' Britain First members repeatedly told local Muslims that Britain was not their country, and in the words of charity Tell Mama, acted in an "intimidating" way aimed at "inflaming" tensions.
Britain First, however, saw it differently saying that they had faced "ferocious hostility from local Muslims". Video of the 'Christian Patrol', Britain First wrote, was a "shocking look into the Islamisation of our beloved country". Its activists, the party said, were pelted with eggs and verbally abused by Muslims who claimed to have "taken over" Luton.

In an email to Britain First members earlier this month, Golding wrote that "we are running out of time to get prepared for the new legal onslaught". The party, he said, needed to raise £5,000 to defend itself. So far Golding said it had raised £1,960.
Golding noted that Bedfordshire's police first attempt to ban the party from Luton had left it with "egg on their faces" and that their recent march had "exposed that Bury Park in Luton is a no-go zone for non-Muslims" (A day after their march local Christian's handed out roses in the town, distancing themselves from Britain First's views, and calling for community cohesion).
Golding wrote that no members of the local community, "even the ones who shouted racist abuse and who actually attacked some of our activists" would be charged. "Can you actually believe what you are reading," Golding's email read.
Golding: "The Muslim bigots of Bury Park have been given free rein to inflict violence and racism on outsiders.
"Even if the law has been broken, the Assistant chief constable of Luton police will not arrest you if you are Muslim!
"We did not expect this and we are totally unprepared for a new legal battle against Bedfordshire Police in the High court.
"These taxpayer-funded parasites are going to try again to scupper our movement but, like last time, we will fight till our dying breath against them no matter what they throw at us.
britain first
Muslim men confront Britain First members during their 'Christian Patrol' in Luton
"They are hoping that we will be unable to defend ourselves again like last time and then the Muslim bigots of Luton will be able to form a Sharia Law enclave with the help of the police!
"Once again, our very existence is on the line as well as freedom of speech and democracy in our beloved Britain.
"Please, please, please chip into our urgent legal fighting fund and give us the tools we need to fight off this latest attempt to sabotage our movement."
Golding's email ended by saying: "No wonder the Muslims in Bury Park were happy to shout "We Muslims are taking over!" on the video we put online of our action in Luton - they know the authorities will bend over backside to appease them!"
At present, there are two petitions against Britain First. One to ban them from Facebook and Twitter has over 900 signatures, and another to ban them as a political party has over 12,000.
A response to the petition by the Home Office, published on 28 January, said while the government kept the list of proscribed organisations "under review" it would not confirm if it was considering banning Britain First.
However, according to the International Business Times, The Home Office added: "The government condemns those who seek to spread hate by demonising British Muslims. Those who seek to divide us damage our country by stoking anti-Muslim hatred and deliberately raise community fears and tensions by bringing disorder and violence to our towns and cities."
Please comment below. The Site is open to the public. Therefore, consider your comments carefully and do not include anything in a comment that you would like to keep private. By uploading or otherwise making available any information to the Author in the form of user generated comments or otherwise, you grant the Author the unlimited, perpetual right to distribute, display, publish, reproduce, reuse and copy the information contained therein. You are responsible for the content you post. You may not impersonate any other person through the Site. You may not post content that is obscene, defamatory, threatening, fraudulent, invasive of another person’s privacy rights or is otherwise unlawful. You may not post content that infringes the intellectual property rights of any other person or entity. You may not post any content that contains any computer viruses or any other code designed to disrupt, damage, or limit the functioning of any computer software or hardware.

Disqus for Ste Matthew Murray

Disqus

Popular posts from this blog

UK Lord Justice wanted age of consent lowered to the age of 4

Lord Justice Fulford was named last year as an adviser to the QueenHe was a key backer of the notorious Paedophile Information Exchange Police suspect the group of abusing children on an ‘industrial scale’He is revealed as a founder member of campaign to defend PIEAt the time it was calling for the age of consent to be lowered to just fourI clashed with Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) global leaders at the Wales conference in Swansea in 1977. Tom O’Carroll is still accepted and active on a sexnet chat group of experts in “sexology” although he writes openly as a pedophile. And the scholarly organizers of the Swansea conference at the University were part of his efforts. Below a summary of my intro to him in my book, Stolen Honor, Stolen Innocence, 2013. This academic pedophile lobby has continued and grown, training second generation and third generation supporters as “scholars” for pedophile equality and “rights.” In 1981 I realized they were global. See the B4UAct conference wi…

Tory MP's Private Company in Charge of Election votes and counts

Tory MP Peter Lilley’s company IDOX was given contracts across Scotland by SNP and Labour councils to quietly privatise the entire electoral process and control of postal votes and election counts across Scotland.


The contracts were awarded to ensure private control of all Scottish elections for the three-year period covering the EU election, the general election, the EU referendum and the Scottish Elections which allow IDOX to control, open, count and put forward "postal" ballot papers to be put into ballot boxes right up to the 10 pm deadline.

By May 2013 IDOX boasted they already had control of elections and voter registration and votes for 13 million people across the UK in the privatisation of all elections that most voters in the UK are completely unaware of.

Does this mean it is possible for postal votes to be binned (if private operators don't agree with the vote provided) and replaced using signatures they store electronically and can ballot papers be made up in pe…

Jill Dando tried to expose BBC paedophile ring but 'nobody wanted to know (including exclusive first look at the new documentary)

MURDERED BBC TV presenter Jill Dando raised the issue of a possible paedophile ring in the corporation - but no action was taken.



A former colleague and friend told us that Miss Dando, from Weston-super-Mare, tried to get bosses to investigate what was going on. The source said that the Crimewatch presenter was told that 'big name stars' and BBC staff were involved in abuse. A file was eventually handed to senior management in the mid-1990s, but no action was taken on the matter.
The source, who remains anonymous, said: “She compiled a file of complaints but she was not really an investigative journalist, just a presenter. “She passed the information to someone else and they gave it back. No one wanted to know.” Miss Dando was shot outside her London home in 1999 at the age of 37.

EXCLUSIVE WATCH THE FIRST FOUR MINUTES OF THE NEW DOCUMENTARY NOW
Justice For Jill